Direct democracy, ‘plebiscitarianism’ and military rule: Is the Portuguese normative view of democracy multidimensional?

Goffredo Adinolfi

Abstract


In its annual report, Freedom House stresses how ‘[…] after years of major gains, the share of free countries has declined over the past decade, while the share of not free countries has risen’. In this depiction of the profound crisis of mainstream political parties, Portugal is a clear exception: unlike in Spain with Podemos, Italy with the Movimento 5 Stelle and Greece with Syriza, new anti-system parties did not find the political spaces in which to operate. However, we need to understand whether the absence of such parties in parliament corresponds with a matching absence in public opinion of support for forms of disfigured democracy and underlying factors. This article is based on quantitative methods and multilevel analysis. Findings indicate that in Portugal the normative view of democracy is consistent on many levels with that of Europeans in general: unanimous support for democracy (90%), alongside backing for different forms of democracy – direct democracy (80%), partial democracy (50%, plebiscitary and technocratic) and authoritarian rule (18%). Nevertheless, we can still detect differences in the underlying factors on the level of illegitimacy and cognitive and political mobilization.


References


Abramowitz, M. J. (2018), Democracy in Crisis, Freedom in the World, Washington, DC: Freedom House.

Accornero, G. and Pinto, P. R. (2014), ‘“Mild mannered”? Protest and mobilisation in Portugal under austerity’, West European Politics, 38:3, pp. 491–515, tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402382.2014.937587. Accessed 12 July

Adinolfi, G. (2010), ‘A formação dos campos políticos em Portugal e Itália: Novos ou velhos paradigmas de recrutamento político após a queda dos regimes autoritários’ (‘The formation of political camps in Portugal and Italy: New or old paradigms of political recruitment after the fall of authoritarian regimes’), Perspectivas, 5, pp. 147–66.

Adinolfi G. (2016), ‘O Movimento 5 Estrelas e a lei férrea da oligarquia’; R:I, 50, pp. 71–85.

Adinolfi, G. and Goulart, M. (2018), ‘O desafio populista à democracia representativa: A Venezuela chavista e o Movimento 5 Estrelas’, Análise Social, 227:2, pp. 388–414.

Andreadis, I. and Stavrakakis, Y. (2017), ‘European populist parties in government: How well are voters represented? Evidence from Greece’, Swiss Political Science Review, 23:4, pp. 485–508.

Anon. (2016), ‘Plebiscites in Europe: Referendumania’, The Economist, 19 May, https://www.economist.com/europe/2016/05/19/referendumania. Accessed 10 August 2018.

Bengtsson, Å. and Mattila, M. (2009), ‘Direct democracy and its critics: Support for direct democracy and “stealth” democracy in Finland’, West European Politics, 32:5, pp. 1031–48.

Besir, C. and Magalhães, P. C. (2016), ‘How people understand democracy: A social dominance approach’, in M. Ferrín and H. Kriesi (eds), How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 90–110.

Biancalana, C. (ed.) (2018), Disintermediazione e Nuove Forme di Mediazione: Verso una Democrazia Post-Rappresentativa? (Disintermediation and New Forms of Mediation: Towards a Post-Representative Democracy?), Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.

Bobbio, N. (2008), Liberalismo e Democrazia (Liberalism and Democracy), Milan: Simonelli.

Crouch, C. (2005), Postdemocrazia (Post-Democracy), Bari: Laterza.

Dalton, R. J. (2007), ‘Partisan mobilization, cognitive mobilization, and the changing American electorate’, Electoral Studies, 26:2, pp. 274–86.

Dalton, R. J., Bürklin, W. and Drummond, A. (2001), ‘Public opinion and direct democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 12:4, pp. 141–53.

Deseriis, M. (2017), ‘Direct parliamentarianism: An Analysis of the political values embedded in Rousseau, the “operating system” of the Five Star Movement’, JeDEM, 9:2, pp. 47–67.

Diamanti, I. (2014), Democrazia Ibrida (Hybrid Democracy), Bari: Laterza.

—— (2017), ‘La voglia dell’Uomo forte: Il leader solo al comando piace a otto italiani su dieci’ (‘The desire of the strong Man: Eight out of ten Italians think the leader should command’), La Repubblica, 24 January, repubblica.it/politica/2017/01/24/news/la_voglia_dell_uomo_forte_il_leader_solo_al_comando_piace_a_otto_italiani_su_dieci-156725748/. Accessed 12 July 2018.

Diamanti, I. and Lazar, M. (2018), Popolocrazia: La Metamorfosi delle nostre Democrazie (Popolocracy: The Metamorphosis of our Democracies), Bari: Laterza.

Elgie, R. (2018), ‘The election of Emmanuel Macron and the new French party system: A return to the eternel marais?’, Modern & Contemporary France, 26:1, pp. 15–29.

Jalali, C., Lobo, M. C., Pereira, J. S. and Silva, P. (2016), Opinião Publica a União Europeia, Relatorio Nacional, Eurobarómetro Standard 86.

Ferrín, M. and Kriesi, H. (eds) (2016), How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Freire, A. (2016), ‘The condition of Portuguese democracy during the Troika’s intervention’, Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 15:2, pp. 173–93.

Freire, A. and Baum, M. (2003), ‘1998 Portuguese referendums: Explaining the results and speculating on the future of direct democracy in Portugal’, Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 2:1, pp. 5–19.

Freire, A. and Pereira, J. S. (2012), ‘Portugal, 2011: The victory of the neoliberal right, the defeat of the left’, Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 11:2, pp. 179–87.

—— (2016), ‘The Portuguese national election of 2015: From austerity to the fall of the Portuguese “Berlin Wall”’, Pôle Sud, 1:44, pp. 143–52.

Freire, A. and Viegas, J. M. L. (2009), ‘Inquérito à população portuguesa: Base de dados, 2008’ (‘Survey of the Portuguese population: Database, 2008’), in A. Freire, J. M. L. Viegas and F. Seiceira (eds), Representação Política em Portugal: Inquéritos e Bases de Dados (Political Representation in Portugal: Surveys and Databases), Lisbon: Sextante, n.pag.

Gunther, R. and Montero, J. R. (2006), ‘The multidimensionality of political support for new democracies: Conceptual redefinition and empirical refinement’, in J. R. Montero and M. Torcal (eds), Political Disaffection in

Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics, London: Routledge, pp. 46–78.

Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Inquérito à População Portuguesa-Bases de Dados (2012), ‘Eleições, liderança e responsabilização: a representação política em Portugal – Uma perspectiva longitudinal e comparativa’ (FCT: PTDC/CPJ-CPO/119307/2010) (CIESIUL/ISCTE-IUL; 2012–15), er.cies.iscte-iul.pt. Accessed 12 July 2018.

Kriesi, H. and Morlino, L. (2016), ‘Conclusion: What have we learnt, and where do we go from here?’, in M. Ferrín and H. Kriesi (eds), How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 307–26.

Larry, A. (2018), ‘Brexit and the future of liberal democracy’, Cardozo Law Review, 39:3, pp. 845–48.

Leininger, A. (2015), ‘Popular support for direct democracy in Europe’, ECPR Joint Sessions, 2 March.

Lobo, M. C. (2013), ‘Dimensions of the economic vote: Valence, positional and patrimony voting in Portugal’s 2011 elections’, Electoral Studies, 31:3, pp. 522–28.

Magalhães, P. (2005), ‘Disaffected democrats: Political attitudes and political action in Portugal’, West European Politics, 28:5, pp. 973–91.

—— (2014), ‘The elections of the great recession in Portugal: Performance voting under a blurred responsibility for the economy’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24:2, pp. 180–202.

Mair, P. (2009), ‘Representative versus responsible government’, MPIfG working paper, ,Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

Medir, L. (2015), ‘Understanding local democracy in Catalonia: From formally institutionalized processes to self-organized social referenda on independence’, International Journal of Iberian Studies, 28:2&3, pp. 267–81.

Montero, R. and Torcal, M. (2006), Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democarcies: Social Capital, Institutions and Politics, London: Routledge.

Norris, P. (ed.) (2011), Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rosanvallon, P. (2008), Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Salgado, A. (2018), ‘Where’s populism? Online media and the diffusion of populist discourses and styles in Portugal’, European Political Science, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41304-017-0137-4. Accessed 12 July 2018.

Sola, J. and Rendueles, C. (2017), ‘Podemos: The upheaval of Spanish politics and the challenge of populism’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26:1, pp. 99–116.

Teixeira, C. P. and Pereira, P. A. de (2012), ‘Is there significant erosion of political system support in Portugal? Longitudinal and comparative analysis (2000–10)’, Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 11:2, pp. 135–60.

Teixeira, C. P., Tsatsanis, E. and Belchior, A. M. (2014), ‘Support for democracy in times of crisis: Diffuse and specific regime support in Portugal and Greece’, South European Society and Politics, 19:4, pp. 501–18.

Urbinati, N. (2013), Democrazia in Diretta: Le Nuove Sfide della Rappresentanza (Live Democracy: The New Challenges of the Representation), Milan: Feltrinelli.

—— (2014), Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People, London: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.