Social Classes and Tolerance to Corruption in Portugal: What is the Relationship?

Marcelo Moriconi, Tiago Carvalho

Abstract


Corruption has been perceived as one of the main problems in Portuguese politics and society. However, the phenomenon is not new for the country. Therefore, this article tries to identify the ways in which tolerance to corruption is disseminated amongst various social classes. In order for a source of unrest to persist for a length of time, it requires a high degree of social tolerance. Using data from a 2006 survey (corruption and ethics in democracy project), this article presents a portrait of how different social classes correspond to different types of tolerance to parochial corruption. These groups have different views regarding the phenomenon as well as certain forms of non-transactive corruption that reproduce tolerance to corruption.

References


Accornero, G. and Pinto, P. R. (2015), ‘“Mild mannered’? Protest and mobilisation in Portugal under austerity, 2010–2013’, West European Politics 38: 3, pp. 491–515.

Alvarez, J. P. (2015), ‘Low-level corruption tolerance: An ‘action-based’ approach for Peru and Latin America’, Journal of Politics in Latin America 7: 2, pp. 99–129.

Atkinson, W. (2009), ‘Rethinking the work-class nexus: Theoretical foundations for recent trends’, Sociology 43: 5, pp. 896–912.

Becquart-Leclercq, J. (1984), ‘Paradoxes de la corruption politique / Paradoxes of political corruption’, Pouvoirs 31, pp. 19–36.

Blake, C. (2009), ‘Public attitudes toward corruption’, in C. H. Blake and S. D. Morris (eds.), Corruption and Democracy in Latin America, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 94–107.

Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1986), ‘The forms of capital’, In J. Richardson (ed), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York, NY: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.

Carmo, R. M. and Nunes, N. (2013), ‘Class and social capital in Europe’, European Societies 15: 3, pp. 373–387.

Chang, E. C. C., Golden, M. A. and Hill, S. J. (2010), ‘Legislative malfeasance and political accountability’, World Politics 62: 2, pp. 177–220.

Collins, J. D., Uhlenbruck, K. and Rodriguez, P. (2009), ‘Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 87: 1, pp. 89–108.

Costa, A. F. da, Machado, F. L. and Almeida, J. F. de. (2009), ‘Social classes and educational assets: A transnational analysis’, in A. F. da Costa, F. L. Machado, and P. Ávila (eds.), Knowledge and Society, Vol. II: Portugal in the European Context, Oeiras: Celta, pp. 5–20.

Costa, A. F. da, Mauritti, R., Martins, S. da C., Machado, F. L. and Almeida, J. F. de (2000), ‘Classes sociais na Europa / Social classes in Europe’, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 34, pp. 9–46.

Delhey, J. and Newton, K. (2005), ‘Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism?’, European Sociological Review 21: 4, pp. 311–327.

Della Porta, D. (2014), Social Movements in Times of Austerity: Bringing Capitalism Back into Protest Analysis, Cambridge: Polity.

European Commission (2014), ‘Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: EU anti-corruption report’, Brussels, available at http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/documents/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/corruption/docs/acr_2014_en.pdf, accessed 3 August 2016.

Fadahunsi, A. and Rosa, P. (2002), ‘Entrepreneurship and illegality: Insights from the Nigerian cross-border trade’, Journal of Business Venturing 17: 5, pp. 397–429.

Ferranti, D. de, Perry, G. E., Ferreira, F. and Walton, M. (2004), Inequality in Latin America, Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Foucault, M. (1992), Tecnologías del Yo / Today’s Technologies. Barcelona: Paidos.

Fried, B. J., Lagunes, P. and Venkataramani, A. (2010), ‘Corruption and inequality at the crossroad: A multi-method study of bribery and discrimination in Latin America’, Latin American Research Review 45: 1, pp. 76–97.

Gramsci, A. (1980), Prison Notebooks, London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Grießhaber, N. and Geys, B. (2012), ‘Civic engagement and corruption in 20 European democracies’, European Societies 14: 1, pp 57–81.

Guerrero, M. A. and Rodríguez-Oreggia, E. (2008), ‘On the individual decisions to commit corruption: A methodological complement’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 65: 2, pp. 357–372.

Hellman, J. S. and Kaufmann, D. (2004), ‘The inequality of influence’, in J. Kornai (ed), Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 100–118.

Hunt, J. (2007), ‘How corruption hits people when they are down’, Journal of Development Economics 84: 2, pp. 574–589.

Hunt, J. and Laszlo, S. (2005), Bribery: Who Pays, Who Refuses, What Are the Payoffs? NBER Working Paper 11635.

Huntington, S. P. (2006), Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Johnston, M. (1986), ‘Right and wrong in American politics: Popular conceptions of corruption’, Polity 18: 3, pp. 367–391.

Jong-Sung, Y. and Khagram, S. (2005), ‘A comparative study of inequality and corruption’, American Sociological Review 70: 1, pp. 136–157.

Kurer, O. (2001), ‘Why do voters support corrupt politicians?’, in A. K. Jain (ed), The Political Economy of Corruption, London: Routledge, pp. 63–85.

Lagunes, P. (2009), Irregular Transparency? An Experiment Involving Mexico’s Freedom of Information Law. Working Paper, Department of Political Science, Yale University.

Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007), The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence and Policy, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1997), ‘Trust in large organizations’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 87: 2, pp. 333–338.

Manzetti, L. and Wilson, C. J. (2007), ‘Why do corrupt governments maintain public support?’, Comparative Political Studies 40: 8, pp. 949–970.

Marques, D. (2010), Corrupção Fora de Prazo: Prescrição de Crimes Na Justiça Portuguesa / Out of Date Corruption: Limiting Crimes in the Portuguese Justice System. Lisbon: Transparência e Integridade

Mocan, N. (2008), ‘What determines corruption? International evidence from microdata’, Economic Inquiry 46: 4, pp. 493–510.

Moriconi, M. (2009), ‘El malestar social y la víctima-cómplice / Social Unrest and the victim-accomplice’, Polis 5: 1, pp. 115–142.

Moriconi, M. (2011), Retórica, Política Y Administración Pública: Por Qué Fallan Las Reformas Administrativas / Rhetoric, Politics and Public Administration: Why Administrative Reforms Fail, Mexico City: UAM-CLASCO.

Moriconi, M. (2013), Ser Violento: Los Orígenes de La Inseguridad Y La Víctima-Cómplice / Being Violent: The Origins of Insecurity and the Victim-Accomplice, Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.

Moriconi, M. and Carvalho, T. (2013), ‘Ética, responsabilidade e democracia: O problema da tolerância à corrupção / Ethics, responsibility and democracy: The problem of tolerance of corruption’, in H. V. Neto and S. L. Coelho (eds.), Responsabilidade Social, Respeito e Ética na Vida em Sociedade, Lisbon: Civeri.

Morris, S. D. and Klesner, J. L. (2010), ‘Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico’, Comparative Political Studies 43: 10, pp. 1258–1285.

Nielsen, A. (2006), ‘Corruption, hierarchies and bureaucratic structures’, In S. Rose-Ackerman (ed), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Nye, J. S. (1967), ‘Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis’, American Political Science Review 61: 2, pp. 417–427.

Observador (2015), ‘Portugueses colocam país no top 5 dos mais corruptos / Portuguese place country among the five most corrupt’, June 16, available at http://observador.pt/2015/06/16/portugal-em-5-o-lugar-entre-os-38-paises-mais-corruptos/, accessed 3 August 2016.

Pimenta, R. (2015), ‘“Corrupção” foi a palavra de 2014 para a Porto Editora / “Corruption” was Porto Editora’s 2014 word of the year’, Público, January 5, available at https://www.publico.pt/culturaipsilon/noticia/corrupcao-foi-a-palavra-de-2014-para-a-porto-editora-1681205, accessed 3 August 2016.

Pinto, A. C., Magalhães, P. C., Sousa, L. de and Gorbunova, E. (2012), A Qualidade Da Democracia Em Portugal: A Perspetiva Dos Cidadãos / The Quality of Portuguese Democracy: The Citizens’ View. Lisbon: Barómetro Qualidade da Democracia, ICS.

Plata, J. C. (2012), Barómetro de las Américas: 2012 - Sobornar o no sobornar / Americas Barometer: 2012 - To Bribe or Not to Bribe. Perspectivas 72, available at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/IO872_es.pdf, accessed 3 August 2016.

Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Redlawsk, D. P. and McCann, J. A. (2005), ‘Popular Interpretations of “corruption” and their partisan consequences’, Political Behavior 27: 3, pp. 261–283.

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978), Corruption: A Study in Political Economy, New York, NY: Academic.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1980), Discurso Sobre El Origen de La Desigualdad Entre Los Hombres / Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality among Men, Madrid: Alianza.

Salzman, R. (2009), ‘Differentiated corruption and regime legitimacy: Splitting the variable in the Latin American context’, The Southern Political Science Association, 8-10 January. New Orleans, LA.

Scott, J. C. (1972), Comparative Political Corruption, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Seligson, M. A. (2006), ‘The measurement and impact of corruption victimization: Survey evidence from Latin America’, World Development 34: 2, pp 381–404.

Sousa, L. de (2008), ‘“I don’t bribe, I just pull strings’: Assessing the fluidity of social representations of corruption in Portuguese society’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9: 1, pp. 8–23.

Sousa, L. de and Moriconi, M. (2013), ‘Why voters do not throw the rascals out: A conceptual framework for analysing electoral punishment of corruption’, Crime, Law and Social Change 60: 5, pp. 471–502.

Sousa, L. de and Triães, J. (2008), Corrupção e os Portugueses: Atitudes, Práticas E Valores / Corruption and Portuguese: Attitudes, Practices and Values. Lisbon: RCP Edições.

Sousa, L. de (2011), Corrupção / Corruption, Lisbon: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.

Sousa, L. de, Magalhães, P. C. and Amaral, L. (2014), ‘Sovereign debt and governance failures: Portuguese democracy and the financial crisis’, American Behavioral Scientist 58: 12, pp. 1517–1541.

Transparência e Integridade (2012), Sistema Nacional de Integridade, Lisbon: Transparência e Integridade.

Transparency International (2016), ‘Corruption perceptions index’, Transparency International, available at http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview, accessed 4 August 2016.

Transparency International. 2012. Money, Politics, Power: Corruption Risks in Europe by Transparency International - ISSUU. Berlin. https://issuu.com/transparencyinternational/docs/corruption_risks_in_europe?backgroundColor=.

Transparency International (2013), Global Corruption Barometer: 2013, available at http://www.transparency.org/gcb2013, accessed 3 August 2016.

Treisman, D. (2000), ‘The causes of corruption: A cross-national study’, Journal of Public Economics 76: 3, pp 399–457.

Uslaner, E. M. (2004), ‘Trust and corruption’, in G. Lamsdorff, M. Taube, and M. Schramm (eds.), Corruption and the New Institutional Economics, London: Routledge.

Uslaner, E. M. (2006), ‘Corruption and Inequality’, CESifo DICE Report 9: 2, pp. 20–24.

Weber Abramo, C. (2008), ‘How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us?’, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 2, available at http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008-3, accessed 3 August 2016.

You, J.-S. (2005), Corruption and Inequality as Correlates of Social Trust: Fairness Matters More Than Similarity, Cambridge, MA: The Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations and The John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.