Pragmatism and liberation: FRELIMO and the legitimacy of an African independence movement

Michael Panzer

Pragmatism and liberation: FRELIMO and the legitimacy of an African independence movement

Michael Panzer

Abstract

This article introduces a new paradigm for scholars interested in liberation movements’ political development and strategies for legitimation. Specifically, the article argues for the historicity of revolutionary pragmatism as a lens to study liberation movements. The decisions, discourses and, most importantly, actions of the leaders of the Frente de Libertação de Moçambique (FRELIMO – Mozambique Liberation Front) during the 1960s reflected a series of evolving strategies that were necessary to achieve legitimacy for the liberation movement during the anti-colonial war against Portugal. As an attribute of its early political development, legitimacy was an essential aspect of FRELIMO’s status as a liberation front because it was the foundation upon which to establish a viable authority that appealed to both Mozambicans and international observers. FRELIMO’s leaders actively sought to establish and maintain the loyalty of many ordinary Mozambicans who either joined the liberation front or, at the very least, sympathized with the movement’s efforts to fight the Portuguese and liberate Mozambique. The initial interactions between FRELIMO cadres and Mozambicans from 1962 to 1968 necessitated organizational adaptability to contend with the unpredictable contingencies of war. As a hallmark of the liberation movement’s revolutionary pragmatism, then, FRELIMO leaders held a foundational First Congress that established a framework of ideological and ‘governing’ strategies in order to achieve the desired ends of independence.This article introduces a new paradigm for scholars interested in liberation movements’ political development and strategies for legitimation. Specifically, the article argues for the historicity of revolutionary pragmatism as a lens to study liberation movements. The decisions, discourses and, most importantly, actions of the leaders of the Frente de Libertação de Moçambique (FRELIMO – Mozambique Liberation Front) during the 1960s reflected a series of evolving strategies that were necessary to achieve legitimacy for the liberation movement during the anti-colonial war against Portugal. As an attribute of its early political development, legitimacy was an essential aspect of FRELIMO’s status as a liberation front because it was the foundation upon which to establish a viable authority that appealed to both Mozambicans and international observers. FRELIMO’s leaders actively sought to establish and maintain the loyalty of many ordinary Mozambicans who either joined the liberation front or, at the very least, sympathized with the movement’s efforts to fight the Portuguese and liberate Mozambique. The initial interactions between FRELIMO cadres and Mozambicans from 1962 to 1968 necessitated organizational adaptability to contend with the unpredictable contingencies of war. As a hallmark of the liberation movement’s revolutionary pragmatism, then, FRELIMO leaders held a foundational First

References

Alpers, E. A. (1975), Ivory and Slaves in East Central Africa: Changing Patterns of International Trade to the Nineteenth Century, London: Heinemann.

—— (1984), ‘“To seek a better life”: The implications of migration from Mozambique to Tanganyika for class formation and political behaviour’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 18: 2, pp. 367–88.

Aluka (1962), Mozambique Liberation Documents Collection, ‘1st Congress, Dar-es-Salaam, 23–28 September 1962’, www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.pwmoz000021. Accessed 22 February 2014.

Bernstein, R. J. (2010), The Pragmatic Turn, Malden, MA: Polity.

Bonate, L. J. K. (2013), ‘Muslims and the liberation struggle in northern Mozambique’, in H. Sapire and C. Saunders (eds), Southern African Liberation Struggles: New Local, Regional and Global Perspectives, Claremont: UCT Press, pp. 58–75.

Bragança, A. de and Depelchin, J. (1986), ‘Da idealização da FRELIMO á compreensão da história de Moçambique’/‘From the idealization of FRELIMO to an understanding of the history of Mozambique’, Estudos Moçambicanos, (Mozambican Studies) 5: 6, pp. 29–52.

Cabral, A. (2008), Unity and Struggle: Speeches and Writings, 2nd ed., Johannesburg: Unisa Press.

Cabrita, J. M. (2000), Mozambique: The Tortuous Road to Democracy, New York: Palgrave.

Cooper, F. (2005), Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Dewey, J. (1958), Experience and Nature, New York: Dover.

—— (2008), Human Nature and Conduct, New York: Barnes and Noble.

Funada-Classen, S. (2012), The Origins of War in Mozambique: A History of Unity and Division, Somerset West: African Minds.

Habermas, J. (1975), Legitimation Crisis, Boston, MA: Beacon.

—— (1985), The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Boston, MA: Beacon.

Havik, P. J. (2012), ‘Virtual nations and failed states: Making sense of the labyrinth’, in E. Morier-Genoud (ed.), Sure Road? Nationalisms in Angola, Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique, Leiden: Brill, pp. 31–76.

Henriksen, T. H. (1983), Revolution and Counterrevolution: Mozambique’s War of Independence, 1964–1974, Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Hickman, L. A. (2007), Pragmatism and Post-Postmodernism: Lessons from John Dewey, New York: Fordham University Press.

Isaacman, A. and Issacman, B. (1983), Mozambique: From Colonialism to Revolution, 1900–1982, Boulder, CO: Westview.

James, W. (1995), Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, New York: Dover.

Khamba, J. M. (2012), 14 August, interview.

Knight, J. and Johnson, J. (2011), The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Krasner, S. D. (1999), Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

MacQueen, N. (1997), The Decolonization of Portuguese Africa: Metropolitan Revolution and the Dissolution of Empire, New York: Longman.

Maguire, G. A. (2008), Toward ‘Uhuru’ in Tanzania: The Politics of Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Minter, W. (1994), Apartheid’s Contras: An Inquiry into the Roots of War in Angola and Mozambique, Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.

Mondlane, E. (1983), The Struggle for Mozambique, London: Zed.

Morier-Genoud, E. (ed.) (2012), Sure Road? Nationalisms in Angola, Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique, Leiden: Brill.

The Nationalist (6 October 1964) “600 Refugees Enter Tanzan.”

Ncomo, B. L. (2003), Uria Simango: Um Homem, Uma Causa/Uria Simango: A Man, A Cause, 3rd ed., Maputo: Central Impressora e Editora de Maputo.

Opello, W. C., Jr. (1975), ‘Pluralism and elite conflict in an independence movement: FRELIMO in the 1960s’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 2: 1, pp. 66–82.

Panzer, M. G. (2009), ‘The pedagogy of revolution: Youth, generational conflict and education in the development of Mozambican nationalism and the state, 1962–1970’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 35: 4, pp. 803–20.

—— (2013a), ‘A nation in name, a “state” in exile: The FRELIMO Proto-state, youth, gender and the liberation of Mozambique, 1962–1975’, Doctoral thesis, State University of New York.

—— (2013b), ‘Building a revolutionary constituency: Mozambican refugees and the development of the FRELIMO proto-state, 1964–1968’, Social Dynamics: A Journal of African Studies, 39: 1, pp. 5–23.

Poppe, G. (2009), ‘The origins of Mozambique’s liberalization: A reassessment of FRLEIMO’s early years’, Doctoral thesis, University of Southern California.

Sapire, H. and Saunders, C. (eds) (2013), Southern African Liberation Struggles: New Local, Regional and Global Perspectives, Claremont: UCT Press.

Saul, J. S. (1979), The State and Revolution in Eastern Africa, New York and London: Monthly Review Press.

Tague, J. (2012), ‘A war to build the nation: Mozambican refugees, rural development, and state sovereignty in Tanzania, 1964–1975’, Doctoral thesis, University of California.

The Tanganyika Standard (13 October 1964), “Refugee Total Tops 7,000.”

United Nations (1960), ‘UN Resolution 1514: Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples’, www.un.org/en/decolonization/declaration.shtml. Accessed 22 February, 2014.

Zawangoni, S. A. (2007), A Frelimo e a Formação do Homem Novo, (1964–1974 e 1975–1982)/FRELIMO and the Formation of the New Man, Maputo: Central Impressora e Editora de Maputo.

Zengazenga, A. D. (2013), Memórias de um Rebelde: Uma vida pela Independência e Democracia em Moçambique/Memoirs of a Rebel: A Life for Independence and Democracy in Mozambique, Amazon CreateSpace.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.