Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required) Science and the public: The public understanding of science and its measurements
Abstract
This is the first of a two-part historical review on the relationship between science and its publics in the second half of the twentieth century. The two-part literature review covers major trends in the evolution of this relationship from ‘public understanding of science’ (PUS) in which science was separated from laypeople, through the transition to ‘public participation’ when PUS became a matter for science policy. This first part of the literature describes the arguments that called for an increase in the public’s understanding of science, its measurement, and the academic debate in favour of and against PUS measures. In particular, we refer to the evolution of survey design, and how criticisms of measures of PUS gave rise to the ‘contextual’ perspective in the PUS being favoured over a ‘deficit’ one.
This is the first of a two-part historical review on the relationship between science and its publics in the second half of the twentieth century. The two-part literature review covers major trends in the evolution of this relationship from ‘public understanding of science’ (PUS) in which science was separated from laypeople, through the transition to ‘public participation’ when PUS became a matter for science policy. This first part of the literature describes the arguments that called for an increase in the public’s understanding of science, its measurement, and the academic debate in favour of and against PUS measures. In particular, we refer to the evolution of survey design, and how criticisms of measures of PUS gave rise to the ‘contextual’ perspective in the PUS being favoured over a ‘deficit’ one.
References
Arons, A. B. (1983), ‘Achieving wider scientific literacy’, Daedalus, 112: 2, pp. 91–122.
Asimov, I. (1984), ‘Popularizing Science’, Nature, 306: 11.
Bauer, M. (2005), ‘Public perceptions and mass media in the biotechnology controversy’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17: 1, pp. 5–22.
Bauer, M., Allum, N. and Miller, S. (2007), ‘What we can learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda’, Public Understanding of Science, 16:1, pp. 79–95 .
Bauer, M., Petkova, K. and Boyadjjewa, P. (2000), ‘Public knowledge of and attitudes to science – alternative measures’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 25: 1, pp. 30–51.
Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, New Delhi: Sage.
Brossard, D., Scheufele, D., Kim, E. and Lewenstein, B. (2008), ‘Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology’, Public Understanding of Science, 18:5, pp. 546–55.
Bucchi, M. and Neresini, F. (2002), ‘Biotech remains unloved by the more informed’, Nature, 416, p. 261 .
Calvo , F. and Pardo, R. (2002), ‘Attitudes toward science among the European public: a methodological analysis’, Public Understanding of Science, 11, 155-195.
Durant, J. (1993), ‘What is scientific literacy?’, in Jon Durant and Jane Gregory (ed.), Science and Culture in Europe, London: Science Museum, pp. 129–38.
____ (1999), ‘Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science’, Science and Public Policy, 26: 5, pp. 313–19.
Durant, J., Evans, G. A. and Thomas, G. P. (1989), ‘The public understanding of science’, Nature, 340, pp. 11–14 .
Einsiedel, E. (2000), ‘Understanding 'publics' in the public understanding of science’, in M. Dierkes and C. von Grote (eds), Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology, Amsterdam: Harwood, pp. 205–16.
Einstein, Albert (2006), The World as I see it, abridged ed. New York: Kensigton.
Entradas, M., Miller, S. and Peters, H. P. (2013), ‘Preaching to the converted? An analysis of the UK public for space exploration’, Public Understanding of Science, 22: 3, pp. 269–86.
European Commission (2013), ‘Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation’. Brussels: European Commission.
Evans, D. and Durant, J. (1995), ‘The relationship between knowledge and public attitudes toward science in Britain’, Public Understanding of Science, 4: 1, pp. 57–74.
Gaskell, G., Bauer, B., Durant, J. and Allum, N. (1999), ‘Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified food in Europe and the US’, Science, 16: 285, pp. 384–7.
Gaskell, G., Einsiedel, E., Hallman, E., Priest, W., Jackson, S., and Olsthoorn, J. et al (2005), Social Values and the Governance of Science. Science, 310, 1908-09.
Gregory J. and Miller, S. (1998), Science in Public – Communication, Culture, and Credibility, London: Basic Books.
Grimston, M. C. (1994), ‘Public Opinion Surveys in the UK’, Nuclear Europe Worldscan, 14, 7-8: 98.
Haldane (1939), Science and Everyday Life, London: Lawrence and Wishart Ltd.
Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (1996), Misunderstanding Science?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 280.
Jasanoff, S. (2003), ‘Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans, The Third Wave of Science Studies’, Social Studies of Science, 33:3, pp. 389–400.
Lee, C., Scheufele, D. and Lewenstein, B. (2005), ‘Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public support for nanotechnology’, Science Communication, 27: 2, pp. 240–67.
Laugksch R. C. (2000), ‘Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview’, Science Education, 84: 1, pp. 71–94.
Midden, C. J. H. (1989), ‘Energy and the Public: A Multi-national Comparative Study on Public Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions towards Energy Technologies’, Public Understanding of Science, 4:1, 57-74.
Mill, J. S. (1967), A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, being a Connect View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, London: Longman, pp. 573–78.
Miller, J. D. (1983a), ‘Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review’, Daedalus, 112:2, pp. 29–48.
____ (1983b), The American People and Science Policy, New York: Pergamon Press.
____ (1992), ‘Toward a scientific understanding of the public understanding of science and technology’, Public Understanding of Science, 1: 1, pp. 23–26.
____ (1995), ‘Scientific literacy in the United States’, in R. E. Yager (ed.), 283 Science/Technology/Society as a Reform in Science Education, New York: State University Press of New York, pp. 249-260.
____ (1998), ‘The measurement of civic scientific literacy’, Public understanding of science, 7:3, pp. 203-223
Miller, J. D. and Pardo, R. (2000), ‘Civic scientific literacy and attitude to science and technology: a comparative analysis of the European Union, The United States, Japan, and Canada’, in M. D. a. C. v. Grote (ed.), Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 81-129.
____ (2004), ‘Public understanding of, and Attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know’, Public Understanding of Science, 13: 3, pp. 273–94.
Miller, S. (2001), ‘Public understanding of science at the crossroads’, Public Understanding of Science, 10:1, pp. 115–20.
Nisbet M., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D. and Lewenstein, B. (2002), ‘Knowledge, reservation or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology’, Communication Research, 29: 5, pp. 584–608.
National Science Board (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Arlington VA: National Science Foundation 2002.
Pella, M. O., O’Hearn, G. T. and Gale, C. G. (1966), ‘Referents to scientific literacy’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4:3, pp. 199–208.
Peters, H. P., Albrecht, G., Hennen, L. and Stegelmann, H. U. (1990), ‘Chernobyl' and the nuclear power issue in West German public opinion’, Journal of Environmental Planning, 10, pp. 121–34 .
Roberts, D. (1983), Scientific Literacy. Towards a Balance for Setting Goals for School Science Programs, Ottawa, ON, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services.
Royal Society (1985), The Public Understanding of Science, London: Royal Society.
____ (1990), COPUS Looks Forward, London: Committee on the Public Understanding of Science.
Shamos, M. H. (1995), The Myth of Scientific Literacy, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Shen, B. (1975), ‘Literacy and the public understanding of science’, in S. Day (ed.), Communication of Scientific Information, Baser: Karger, pp.44-52.
Shortland, M. (1987), ‘No business like show business’, Nature, 328 , pp. 213-4.
Shortland, M. and Gregory, J. (1991), Communicating Science: A Handbook, New York: Longman.
Showalter, V. M. (1974), ‘What is united science education? Part 5. Program objectives and scientific literacy’, Prism II, 2:3 + 4 .
Sturgis, P. and Allum, N. (2001), ‘Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: Reply to Hayes and Tariq’, Public Understanding of Science, 10: 4, pp. 427–30.
____ (2004), ‘Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public communication’, Public Understanding of Science, 13: 1, pp. 55–74.
Thomas, G. and Durant, J. (1987), ‘Why should we promote the public understanding of science’, Science Literacy Papers, 23:1, pp. 1–14.
Withey, S. B. (1959), ‘Public opinion about science and scientists’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 17: 1, pp. 382–88.
Wolfendale Committee Final Report (1995), ‘Report of the Committee to Review the Contribution of Scientists and Engineers to Public Understanding of Science’, Office of Science and Technology, London.
Wynne, B. (1991), ‘Knowledges in context’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 16:1, pp. 111–21.
____ (1996), ‘Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science’, in Alan Irwin and Brian Wynne, eds., Misunderstanding Science: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, vol. 1, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–46.
Yearley, S. (2000), ‘What does science mean in the “public understanding of science”?’, in M. D. a. C. v. Grote (ed.), Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science, and Technology, Amesterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 217–36.
Ziman, J. (1991), ‘Public understanding of science’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 16:1, pp. 99–105.
____ (1992), ‘Not knowing, needing to know, and wanting to know’, in B. Lewenstein (ed.), When Science Meets the Public, Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 13–20.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.