The war experience as a ‘Recent Past’: Memoirs, witness accounts and modes of representing the Second World War in Bulgaria during the 1940s and 1950s

Nikolai Vukov

Abstract


Almost immediately after the end of the Second World War, memoir reflections about the war years started to appear in Bulgaria and soon turned into a major form of historiographic reflection. The instances of such books increased particularly from the early 1950s, when core texts about the experience of different partisan groups emerged, laying the basis of central themes and representations of the war over the following decades. Representing historical events through the views of participants and witnesses of the war experience, such memoirs became not only a ‘subjective resource of history’, but also a primary material, from which the emerging post-war historiographic discourse drew locally ingrained inspiration, validity and power of persuasion. The goal of this article is to reflect on the representations of the war experience as a ‘recent past’ in memoirs published during the first decade after the end of the Second World War in Bulgaria. On the basis of an analysis of the main topics and narrative strategies applied in memoir texts from this decade, the text will address core issues related to the interpretation and commemoration of the war years. Focusing on the crucial role played by memoirs about the war in the emerging narratives of communist historiography, the article will outline how they shaped the subsequent conceptualizations of the history and patterns of remembrance of the war years in communist Bulgaria.

Almost immediately after the end of the Second World War, memoir reflections about the war years started to appear in Bulgaria and soon turned into a major form of historiographic reflection. The instances of such books increased particularly from the early 1950s, when core texts about the experience of different partisan groups emerged, laying the basis of central themes and representations of the war over the following decades. Representing historical events through the views of participants and witnesses of the war experience, such memoirs became not only a ‘subjective resource of history’, but also a primary material, from which the emerging post-war historiographic discourse drew locally ingrained inspiration, validity and power of persuasion. The goal of this article is to reflect on the representations of the war experience as a ‘recent past’ in memoirs published during the first decade after the end of the Second World War in Bulgaria. On the basis of an analysis of the main topics and narrative strategies applied in memoir texts from this decade, the text will address core issues related to the interpretation and commemoration of the war years. Focusing on the crucial role played by memoirs about the war in the emerging narratives of communist historiography, the article will outline how they shaped the subsequent conceptualizations of the history and patterns of remembrance of the war years in communist Bulgaria.


References


Andrews, M. (2000), ‘Texts in a changing context: Reconstructing lives in East Germany’, in P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat and T. Wengraf (eds), The Turn to the Biographical Methods in Social Science, London: Routledge, pp. 181–95.

Antohi, S., Apor, P. and Kopecek, M. (eds) (2008), Pasts Continuous: Writing Recent. History in Post-Communist Eastern Europe, Budapest, New York: CEU Press.

Assmann, J. (1992), Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und Politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen/ Cultural Memory: Written Memory and Political Identity in early Civilizations, Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.

Blomqvist, L. E., Arvidsson, C. (1987), Symbols of Power: The Esthetics of Political Legitimation in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

Bock, P. and Wolfrum, E. (eds) (1999), Umkämpfte Vergangenheit. Geschichtsbilder, Erinnerung und Vergangenheitspolitik im internationalen Vergleich/Contested Past: Images of History, Memory and the Policy of the Past in an International Comparison, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Bodnar, J. (1992), Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Brockmeier, J. (2001), ‘From the end to the beginning: Retrospective teleology in autobiography’, in J. Brockmeier and D. Carbaugh (eds), Narrative and Identity: Studies in Autobiography, Self and Culture, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 247–80.

Confino, A. (1997), ‘Collective memory and cultural history: Problems of method’, American Historical Review, 102: 5, pp. 1386–403.

Crampton, R. J. (2002), The Balkans since the Second World War, London: Pearson Education Ltd.

Crane, S. (1997), ‘Writing the individual back into collective memory’, American Historical Review, 102: 5, pp. 1372–85.

Deák, I., Gross, J. T. and Judt, T. (eds) (2000), The Politics of Retribution in Europe: World War II and its Aftermath, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Eakin, P. J. (1992), Touching the World: Reference in Autobiography, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Genov, K. (1958), Nashata memoarna literatura za partizanskoto dvizhenie/‘Our Memoir Literature about the Partisan Movement’, Sofia: Balgarska akademia na naukite.

Fentress, J. and Wickham, Ch. (1992), Social Memory, Oxford: Blackwell.

Gergen, K. J. (1994), ‘Mind, text, and society: Self-memory in social context’, in U. Neisser and R. Fivush (eds), The Remembering Self: Construction and Accuracy in the Self-Narrative, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–104.

Gornenski, N. (1953), Voynishki partizanski batalyon ‘Hristo Botev’. Istoricheski ocherk/‘The Soldierly Battalion “Hristo Botev.” A Historical Essay’, Sofia: Darzhavno voenno izdatelstvo.

Gorov, H. (1944), Vastanicheska borba. Nelegalni izdania na vastanicheskata brigada ‘Georgi Dimitrov’/‘Illegal Editions of the Rebellious Brigade “Georgi Dimitrov”’, Plovdiv: Agitprop na OF.

Halbwachs, M. (1992), On Collective Memory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hartog, F. (2003), Regimes de historicité: présentism et expérience du temps/Historicist Regimes: Presentism and the Experience of Time, Paris: Seuil.

Hodgkin, K. and Radstone, S. (eds) (2003), Contexted Pasts: The Politics of Memory, London: Routledge.

Irwin-Zarecka, I. (1994), Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory, New Brunswick, NC: Transaction.

Jilge, W. and Troebst, S. (eds) (2005), Divided Historical Cultures? World War Two and Historical Memory in Eastern Europe, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Judt, T. (1992), ‘The past is another country: Myth and memory in post-war Europe’, Daedalus, 121: 4, pp. 83–118.

____ (2005), Post-war: A History of Europe since 1945, London: William Heinemann.

Kabaivanska, S. (1986), Spomeni i savremennost/‘Memories and Present Times’, Plovdiv: Izdat. Christo G. Danov.

Koselleck, R. (2002), The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing, History, Spacing Concepts. Cultural Memory in the Present, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Kostov, D. (1955), Geroichnoto partizansko dvizhenie prez 1941-1944 – vdahnovitel na dobrovolnata organizatsia za sadeystvie na otbranata/‘The Heroic Partisan Movement in 1941–1944 – inspiration for the voluntary organization for cooperation to the defense’, Sofia: Darzhavno voenno izdatelstvo.

Kansteiner, W. (2002), ‘Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies’, History and Theory, 41: 2, pp. 179–97.

Lambrev, K. (1946), Naroden glas – Organ na narodoosvoboditelnoto dvizhenie – nelegalno izdanie na partizanskia otred ‘Hristo Botev’/‘People’s voice – press organ of the People Liberating Movement – illegal edition of the Partisan Troop “Hristo Botev”’, Plovdiv: Agitprop na OF.

Lebow, R. N., Kansteiner, W. and C. Fogu (eds) (2006), The Politics of Memory in Post-war Europe, Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Miller, M. L. (1975), Bulgaria during the Second World War, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Mink, Neumayer (eds) (2013), History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Memory Games, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mitev, A. (1952), Partizanskiyat otryad ‘Gavril Genov’/‘The Partisan Troop “Gavril Genov”’, Sofia: Otechestven Front.

Müller, J.-W. (ed.) (2002), Memory and Power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nestorov, H. (1953), Partizanskata aktsia v Rilskoto korito/‘The partisan action in the Rila Valley’, Sofia: no publisher.

Nora, P. (ed.) (1996), Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, New York: Columbia University Press.

Olick, J. K. (1999), ‘Genre memories and memory genres: A dialogical analysis of May 8, 1945 commemorations in the Federal Republic of Germany’, American Sociological Review, 64: 3, pp. 381–402.

Olick, J. K. and Robbins, J. (1998), ‘Social memory studies: From “Collective Memory” to the historical sociology of memory practices’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: pp. 105–40.

Ollila, A. (ed.) (2000), ‘Historical perspectives on memory and history’, The History Teacher, 33: 4, pp. 533–48.

Passerini, L. (1992), Memory and Totalitarianism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rakyovski, Ts. (2004), Obrazi na balgarskata pamet. Istoriyata, pobornitsite, zapiskite/‘Images of the Bulgarian memory. The history, the rebels, the notes’, Veliko Tarnovo: Faber.

Schwartz, B. (1982), ‘The social context of commemoration: A study in collective memory’, Social Forces, 61: 2, pp. 374–402.

Sherman, D. (1999), The Construction of Memory in Inter-war France, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Stråth, B. (ed.) (2000), Myth and Memory in the Construction of Community: Historical Patterns in Europe and Beyond, Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.

Tsochev, R. (1953), Balvanskata bitka/‘The Battle of Balvan’, Sofia: Darzhavno voenno izdatelstvo.

Young, J. (1997), ‘Between history and memory. The uncanny voices of historian and survivor’, History and Memory, 9: 1/2, pp. 47–58.

Zerubavel, Y. (1995), Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.